Jeffrey Williams has produced a thoughtful and timely review of two recent books on academic labor (one by Graduate Center alum Mark Bousquet) in the most recent Dissent. The review surveys Bousquet’s How the University Works: Higher Education and the Low-Wage Nation and Frank Donoghue’s The Last Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities.
Williams’ piece reminds readers of the dismal reality facing grad students and scholars seeking tenure track positions in academia. Only roughly 10 percent of PhDs receive permanent positions in colleges and universities, while at the same moment attrition rates in grad programs nationwide are skyrocketing. “This” Williams writes, “is compounded by those who finish but are stuck in a purgatory of ‘post-docs’ or part-time adjunct positions.’” Far from being populated by “tenured radicals”—as conservative accounts attempt to mythologize American higher education might have it—universities in the United States are filled with “overworked and underpaid adjuncts or graduate students. Instead of being exemplary figures of the postwar meritocracy, the current generation of faculty more likely represents the job-traumatized.”
Williams applauds Bousquet’s focus on labor as the thread that “stitches together the experience of students, faculty, and administration in the university.” But he warns that labor-based arguments for fair treatment only go so far in the American imagination, appealing to those on the “shop floor” but not far beyond. The remedy? “The ground of appeal,” Williams argues, “is what professors provide and what needs they serve. Faculty is not really used to thinking this way; we are accustomed to thinking of ourselves as independent researchers who teach, whereas the public understanding of faculty is that we are primarily teachers.”
Bousquet himself indirectly endorses this view, noting that “Cheap teaching is not a victimless crime.” If this axiom were more strongly embraced by tenured faculty and adjuncts alike, Williams asserts, chances that part-time laborers might find sympathetic audiences to their protests beyond the walls of their union silos would likely increase. After all, “to embrace the recognition that we are labor likely means that we also would have to recognize ourselves more forthrightly as teachers.”
Thoughts?